car, automobile, electro, car wallpapers, electricity, electric mobility, electric car, e mobility, load, technology. Shared charging station designs: one documented owner case and four options
Photo by analogicus on Pixabay

Industry

Part of Shared EV charging station designs for apartment and condo parking

Shared charging station designs: one documented owner case and four options

A documented Green Rock case in Minneapolis, its 2019 charging costs and current range, plus EverCharge, Orange Charger, ChargePoint and make-ready designs.

What to take away

  • One published case beats ten vendor references on shared charging station designs, because the numbers went into print before anyone knew whether the project would look good.
  • Green Rock Apartments in Minneapolis is the most detailed public multifamily case. Its owner chose unnetworked hardware and bundled charging into rent, which removed most of the operational burden.
  • EverCharge, Orange Charger, ChargePoint and utility make-ready programs cover the other common designs. Each puts the cost and the control in a different place.
  • Green Rock's 2019 costs are a dated benchmark for one simple site. The cost section below gives a current typical range for comparison.
  • What transfers between buildings is the reasoning. What does not transfer is the price.

Most of what owners hear about shared charging station designs comes from people selling it. Published owner experiences are rarer and more useful, because the numbers were written down before anyone knew whether the project would look good.

The Department of Energy's multifamily procurement case study of Green Rock Apartments in Minneapolis is one of the most detailed records of a shared charging build-out in the country. Read it in full. It dates from 2019, and some of it has aged.

Four other designs show up in public program filings and provider material: EverCharge's load-sharing network, Orange Charger's bare outlets, ChargePoint's fully networked ports, and utility make-ready programs such as Con Edison's in New York.

Green Rock Apartments, Minneapolis: what the owner did

Green Rock, a Minneapolis multifamily developer, equipped four buildings. One received a DC fast charger supplied free through a manufacturer incentive program, with the owner covering installation labor. Three more buildings and the corporate offices got Level 2 units. By January 2019 the equipped buildings covered 97 housing units.

Two choices shaped everything that followed. They chose unnetworked chargers, specifically to avoid the cost of a networked system. And they made charging free to tenants, folding it into rent, with free parking for residents who drove electric.

What Green Rock's charging cost in 2019

The published figures were roughly $600 per Level 2 unit and roughly $400 per unit to install. The owner also ran a tenant incentive of $2,000 toward an electric vehicle purchase, which 15 tenants used.

Those figures are seven years old, and they reflect Minneapolis labor. For a current anchor, contractor quotes for a simple multifamily Level 2 port typically run about $1,500 to $6,000 installed. Trenching, panel capacity, permit fees and whether make-ready work is funded decide where a site lands in that range.

If a proposal for a comparable simple installation comes in at many times the 2019 figures, ask what your site is doing that theirs was not. Six things usually explain the gap, and they are worth knowing before you make that call.

Why unnetworked worked at Green Rock

This is the part most worth understanding, because it is the decision most owners get wrong in both directions.

Networking exists to authenticate users, bill them, and manage load, but Green Rock needed none of that. Charging was free, so there was nothing to bill, and access was limited to residents, so the parking arrangement handled authentication, not software.

Public access was for emergencies only. That combination is one of three configurations worth pricing separately, and it is cheapest by a wide margin.

Remove billing and access control and a networked system is largely paying for features nobody uses, plus a subscription, plus a dependency. It also collects almost nothing, which quietly settles most of what a board would otherwise have to decide about session records.

The case reports no equipment problems across five years, on standard warranties. Maintenance amounted to watching for misuse and clearing snow. That is what a system with very few moving parts and no software layer looks like when it works.

Four other shared charging designs, and what owners run into

EverCharge. The company, which SK Group bought in 2022, builds shared charging around load sharing. EverCharge's own published material says a building can add ports without a utility service upgrade, which is often the largest single line item in a garage project. Owners keep a network and skip the biggest electrical cost.

Orange Charger. This design puts a bare 240-volt outlet at each space. The company's own price list puts hardware in the hundreds of dollars per port, plus a monthly fee per port. Nothing authenticates and nothing bills, so tenants plug in and the owner reads the electric bill.

ChargePoint. A fully networked system with subscription fees, resident billing and session records. It suits buildings that need per-driver billing or load control. It also carries the dependency risk that Enel X Way customers met in October 2024, when that company said it would wind down its North American charging business.

Utility make-ready programs. Con Edison's EV Make-Ready program in New York funds electrical make-ready work at multifamily buildings and pays an incentive toward eligible chargers, with amounts set in its current tariff. Southern California Edison runs a similar program. The owner buys the chargers and sets the price; the utility pays for the wire behind them.

Four other shared charging designs

At the parking space

Green Rock, Minneapolis
Unnetworked Level 2
EverCharge
Networked Level 2 with load sharing
Orange Charger
240-volt outlet
ChargePoint
Networked Level 2
Con Edison make-ready
Owner's choice of Level 2

Who bills the driver

Green Rock, Minneapolis
Nobody; rent covers it
EverCharge
The owner or its operator
Orange Charger
Nobody
ChargePoint
Usually the operator
Con Edison make-ready
The owner sets it

What the owner pays for

Green Rock, Minneapolis
About $600 per port in 2019, plus about $400 to install
EverCharge
Ports, with no service upgrade
Orange Charger
Outlets in the hundreds per port, plus a monthly fee
ChargePoint
Ports plus a subscription
Con Edison make-ready
Chargers; the program funds make-ready

None of these four carries a dated, published cost breakdown the way Green Rock does. That gap is the reason the Green Rock numbers keep getting quoted. Treat a provider's case study as marketing until it shows a date, an access model and a problem.

What this does not tell you

Free charging bundled into rent suits a rental owner treating charging as an amenity. It does not transfer to a condominium. There, owners will object to subsidizing neighbors through common fees. It does not scale either: a modest electricity increase across 97 units at low adoption becomes a real budget line as more residents switch.

Snow clearing is worth noting too. It appears here as routine maintenance because Minneapolis made it unavoidable. In a warmer city it would not appear at all, and in a garage the equivalent risk is vehicle impact rather than plows.

The owner's own summary was that the chargers were, in his words, "a major draw for tenants," with a modest rise in electricity costs. That is an amenity argument, not a revenue one, and it is honest about which it is.

Reading any case study properly

  • Check the date first.Equipment prices, connector standards and incentive programs have all moved.
  • Find the access model.Free, billed, resident-only or public changes every other number on the page.
  • Look for what is missing.A case study with no problems section usually means the site conditions were easy, not that the technology is flawless.
  • Separate the reasoning from the result.Why Green Rock chose unnetworked hardware transfers to your building. What it paid does not.
  • Check who owns the software.Enel X Way's 2024 North American exit left networked owners hunting for a migration path.

If you are looking for programs that fund this kind of work today, the pilot programs aimed specifically at multifamily housing are a better guide to current funding than a seven-year-old budget. Con Edison's program, now branded PowerReady, has funded multifamily make-ready work in New York since 2020.

For the layouts themselves, the design patterns worth considering cover the physical options, and comparing those options against each other is where a shortlist gets made.

Common questions

Are those 2019 prices still realistic?
Not as a budget. Equipment, labor and code requirements have all changed since, and the current range above is the better number to plan with.
Should we make charging free like they did?
It works for a rental owner treating it as an amenity at low adoption. It gets expensive as uptake grows, and it is hard to justify in a condominium.
Is unnetworked really viable?
Yes, when you are not billing residents individually and access is controlled by parking. It fails the moment you need per-user billing or load management. Orange Charger sells the outlet version of that design, and EverCharge sells the networked version with load sharing.
Where do I find more case studies?
The Alternative Fuels Data Center publishes them alongside its other multifamily material. Prefer documented cases to vendor references, which are chosen rather than published.

More in Industry

Latest from Equipment Desk